A project to make businesses more aware of their customer experience, and how to fix it. By Mark Hurst. |
About Mark Hurst | Mark's Gel Conference | New York Times Story on This Is Broken | Newsletter: Subscribe | RSS Feed |
Search this site:
Categories:
- Advertising
- Current Affairs
- Customer Service
- Fixed
- Food and Drink
- Just for Fun
- Misc
- Not broken
- Place
- Product Design
- Signs
- Travel
- Web/Tech
Previous: Verizon Blackberry support site | Main | Next: "Left lane" sign
September 11, 2006 12:03 AM
Broken: Wells Fargo buyer's defense program
A reader named Mike writes in:
Well that Disclosure is printed on the *inside of the back cover of the envelope!*
The "important disclosure" can't be seen unless you rip apart the envelope, and most people would have already thrown away the envelope after opening it and removing the contents!
banks and financial institution are really taking us customers for granted, and it is no longer a choice for us to take our business to one financial institution or another, it does not matter anymore we are being treated as numbers. Consumer protection organization no much help on this front either. Consumer need to sue them so they can start listening and do a good servce like it used to be.
The terms and conditions which exclude non-working goods are indeed *very* broken, from the customers point of view; sadly, these sort of things are becoming more common from banks. I recently had one which wanted to charge me £20 a year for "Sentinel card protection" which guarantees that as long as you notify them when the card is stolen, you won't be held liable for any fraudulant transactions which are made with your stolen card. In addition, the credit card company offered an Internet Fraud Guarantee:
"If you find out that a transaction using your details has been carried out on the internet without your knowledge or consent, we guarantee not to hold you liable for the fraudulent transaction."
Never mind that both these protections are guaranteed by law.
I would imagine that the 'non-working' goods is referring to the sort of 'as-is' purchases some stores offer that also don't have warranties. But obviously, I could be wrong. Either way, printing inside the envelope without making note of it is beyond shady.
Reminds me of a peice of mail from AOL containing only a check for about $5. However, on the inside of the envolope was an agreement to sign up for something that you accepted by cashing the check.
Comments on this entry are closed
Previous: Verizon Blackberry support site | Main | Next: "Left lane" sign
First!
Wow, very stupid to have important warranty info where it will likely be thrown away, and to have it useless in the first place. Perhaps it be purposeful on behalf of the warranty provider?
Posted by: Serpent_Guard at September 11, 2006 03:29 AM