A project to make businesses more aware of their customer experience, and how to fix it. By Mark Hurst. |
About Mark Hurst | Mark's Gel Conference | New York Times Story on This Is Broken | Newsletter: Subscribe | RSS Feed |
Search this site:
Categories:
- Advertising
- Current Affairs
- Customer Service
- Fixed
- Food and Drink
- Just for Fun
- Misc
- Not broken
- Place
- Product Design
- Signs
- Travel
- Web/Tech
Previous: CNN clock | Main | Next: DVD Genre menu
January 23, 2004 03:12 AM
Broken: Grinder buttons
This photo is of the mini-food processor I bought (after agonizing over it for weeks). Boy, was I surprised to see the labels after forking over some serious money for the high-end "cast metal" version.I guess this one made it past the "quality inspectors."
Odds are, the label is silkscreened before assembly. This is an example of what the manufacturing industry refers to as a "poke-yoke failure"
In other words, the button should be indexed so it cannot be silkscreened or installed incorrectly. Imagine if you just spent $50,000 on a new Lincoln Navigator and the name was upside down on the tailgate, would you say "It's ok, the manufacturer can't inspect EVERY car..."
Personally, I would be really pissed if I spent $50,000 on a Licoln Navigator and the name was upside down.
>>>Always obey Murphy's Law
"If something can go wrong, it will go wrong"
Therefore, If you don't want mistakes, make them impossible
Comments on this entry are closed
Previous: CNN clock | Main | Next: DVD Genre menu
I see your frustration, but look at it from the manufacturing side. Do they REALLY need to check to see if EVERY label is on in the correct direction? You'd think that the person applying the label would have realized it, but that person is human and as capable of making mistake as any of us.
I understand, we want a perfect product, but from the manufacturer's point of view... do they REALLY need to verify that EVERY label is on properly?
"Quality inspectors" SAMPLE the products, because checking EVERY one of them would be too costly.
Posted by: lol at June 20, 2004 01:53 AM